July 2000 · Victoria, Australia
Aged care worker who fell after 29 of 34 hours on duty wins a retrial - jury verdict for employer set aside over unfair attacks on her sleep-loss case
A kitchen hand and personal care attendant at a regional nursing home and hostel fell at work after being on duty for about 29 of the previous 34 hours, including an overnight sleepover shift in which she said she got little if any sleep caring for a sick resident. She sued her employer, alleging that requiring her to work those hours breached its duty to provide a safe system of work. A Supreme Court jury found for the employer in 2008, but in 2010 the Victorian Court of Appeal quashed the verdict and ordered a new trial because defence counsel's address, including an improper argument about her sleep-loss evidence, made the trial unfair. The employer was ordered to pay the worker's costs of the first trial and the appeal.
Case AU-agedcare-06Report an issue