Jan 1994 · Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Airport firefighter refuses 34-hour triple shift; reviewing officer rules fatigue is not a 'danger' under federal law
A federal airport firefighter refused a request to work a triple shift that would have kept him on duty for 34 consecutive hours. A safety officer agreed there was a risk of fatigue affecting performance and safety awareness, and directed the employer to act. On review, the Regional Safety Officer accepted that fatigue may affect performance but held that fatigue was not a 'danger' as federal workplace safety law then defined it, and rescinded the direction. He warned that, given the right conditions, excessive hours would likely become a safety issue, and invited the employer to resolve the problem by consulting the safety and health committee.
Case CA-emergency-02Report an issue