For employees & managers

Awareness eLearning

Fatigue training for employees and managers: what makes the controls at Levels 2 and 3 usable by the people running them.

The problem

Controls only work if people can recognize fatigue

You must give workers information and training about the risks you manage, and fatigue is increasingly named as one of them. Generic sleep-hygiene content rarely meets the published expectation for fatigue training.

Awareness eLearning is built against that expectation, and teaches the one behavior that makes in-shift observation work: recognizing fatigue in yourself and in a colleague.

It works for wellbeing programs too. Open to your whole workforce, not only safety-critical roles, it covers sleep, coping with shift work and recognizing fatigue for everyone.

How it works

How it works

  1. 01

    Assigned

    Assigned to the whole nominated cohort. Access is open to everyone in it, not to a selected group.

  2. 02

    Modules

    Fatigue physiology and circadian science, industry-specific hazards, sleep-disorder education, coping with shift work, and your own fatigue risk management program.

  3. 03

    Recognition

    Recognizing fatigue in yourself and in a colleague: the behavior that makes observation at Level 3 work.

  4. 04

    Completion record

    Completion, knowledge check and self-reported behavior change, recorded for your evidence file.

What the client sees

Who sees what

Reporting comes in a form you can file as training evidence. No clinical or screening result is produced.

Priced on prevalence, not headcount. How pricing works.

Who sees the individual result
Completion is visible as a training record
What the employer receives
Individual completion and aggregate knowledge-check reporting by cohort, location and craft

Evidence

What we can show

A review of operator fatigue training against the published benchmark, by Professor Drew Dawson, found typical material strong on general fatigue awareness and sleep hygiene and short of the benchmark on seven counts. The gap register from that review is the specification for this curriculum.

What it does not establish

Completion is not competence, and competence is not error reduction. It is not a Level 4 control: trapping fatigue-related errors is a matter of task design, cross-checking and error-tolerant procedure, and training is not a substitute for it.

Pathways

Where to go next

See what sleep and fatigue mean for your workforce.

Tell us your industry and roughly how many people you employ. Your snapshot models how many are likely sleeping poorly and what it costs you. Then choose who you’d cover, and we’ll scope the right next step with you: a Fatiguefit Census where fatigue is a safety risk, or a proposal for a wellbeing program.

A sample workforce snapshot on a tablet: modeled sleep problems and the cost of poor sleep for 1,400 people in transport and logistics.